Behind the BIM buzz
In January David Harrison wrote an article about the role of the Building Information Model.
One of the most interesting parts is this:
Given the fragmented nature of the architecture process, the degree of process change required for BIM introduction and the inconsistent level of technology uptake across the entire industry, it will be difficult for BIM to become the predominant form of architectural information storage as we move into the 21st Century. In fact it is highly likely that whilst BIM will continue to build on its role as a central information repository for the architect it will still play a supporting role alongside traditional documentation, numerous digital models (used for simulation, fabrication and presentation) and messaging services such as email, formal meetings and documentation. Consequently the information behind an architectural project may never take on the pure metaphor of a black hole but rather a nebula, open ended, decentralised and full of interesting things that detract from other interesting things, including the odd black hole.
He has a good point. BIM is a very important part of the future, but I do not think it should be an “include-everything” solution. For BIMs to really catch on it is important that the toolchain is flexible.
Recent Comments